I have always had a very strong sense of ethics. It has been very black and white on many things, like stealing. Stealing is wrong, I have always thought. But a number of situations have made me question this. The thread about a homeless person stealing food to live has me thinking that no, if you are faced with stealing and starving, then yeah, you have to steal to survive.
This thread http://www.homelessforums.org/showthread.php?t=8407 about a child being thrown out of home by a parent who won't live up to their responsabilities has gotten me thinking. If the parent won't look after their kid, and is throwing them out with insufficent skills and resources to survive, does the kid have the right to steal from the parent to survive?
I mean, thowing a kid out on the street who has just $100 and isn't equipped with the life skills they need to have a start in life is pretty much dooming the kid to a life of homelessness, crime, assault, absuse, rape or worse.
So, should the child be able to take reasonable things from the parent to help give them a start? Like take the TV and pawn it for start money? Take camping gear? Or even the car?
Or, is it a case of forcing children to fend for themselves? I mean in the older days kids aged 13 were working in mines. They were out tending heards. In developing countries teenagers work for a living. Do they have it too cushy?
I'm not sure either way. I am wondering what others think. Personally I think that parents need to take responsability for that moment of enjoyment having sex, and the concequences that come with that.



Reply With Quote
